Great article!!!!...Ahhh!!!, Yes, Curtis Yarvin, the infamous "Systems Architect", who opportunistically exploited the extremely high 'Probability of Ruin' theory in How-To Dismantle a massively over-indebted political and social system backed by the Federal Reserve Act 1913, aka so-called Govopoly System.
History shows us that when the Global Order snowballs into decline because it is unable to meet its debt obligations, the monetary, political, and social systems are vulnerable to theft.
IMHO, The SovCorp or The Govopoly System has always been in operating in plain sight in America (especially since the 20th Century), but because "extremism" has (re)surfaced or normalized in more recent times due to a shift in the Global Order, and as a result, the veil or curtain has been pulled back for those aware enough to see the scam or fraud that is the "American Democratic System".
In response to the nonsense Yarvin has spouted for many years, my simple retort for his delusional mind is: If the kernel (core) of any operating system is susceptible to any bugs or errors, then the operating system controlling all the systems will be riddled with bugs and error-prone. The irony is that Yarvin, just like Thiel and Musk, are all so unintelligent that they are unable to recognize that their ruling systems are full of flaws, bugs and errors
The issue isn’t just that Yarvin, Thiel, and Musk fail to recognise the flaws in their own proposed systems — it’s that their frameworks are built on the assumption that they themselves are immune to error. The “kernel,” in their worldview, is not a neutral abstraction but a stand-in for their own intellect and authority. This isn’t oversight — it’s narcissism coded as governance. Any system that centralises control around the myth of infallible genius will inherit not just technical vulnerabilities, but human ones: bias, hubris, and the inevitable collapse that follows.
Religious systems suffer from the same design flaw. When the kernel is declared divine, critique becomes blasphemy, and error is sanctified. The result? Atrocities committed not despite belief, but because of it. There is nothing more dangerous than a dictator — except one who believes he kills in the name of God. #Project2025
As we know, any "kernel" within a physical construct is full of imperfections and thus requires "Checks & Balances" via a triangulation model at every step in any given governance framework.
I believe the Yarvin et al psychopathic algorithm wants to fully implement a so-called "God AI" that they solely control, to bypass any "Checks & Balances", and have their Clowns (Trump et al) sell it to the citizens as "Progress & Reform", and the ultimate solution to ALL problems.
This is why "AI & Big Data" are the current real "King & Queen" and central focus (kernel), for the New Dictators
Great article!!!!...Ahhh!!!, Yes, Curtis Yarvin, the infamous "Systems Architect", who opportunistically exploited the extremely high 'Probability of Ruin' theory in How-To Dismantle a massively over-indebted political and social system backed by the Federal Reserve Act 1913, aka so-called Govopoly System.
History shows us that when the Global Order snowballs into decline because it is unable to meet its debt obligations, the monetary, political, and social systems are vulnerable to theft.
IMHO, The SovCorp or The Govopoly System has always been in operating in plain sight in America (especially since the 20th Century), but because "extremism" has (re)surfaced or normalized in more recent times due to a shift in the Global Order, and as a result, the veil or curtain has been pulled back for those aware enough to see the scam or fraud that is the "American Democratic System".
In response to the nonsense Yarvin has spouted for many years, my simple retort for his delusional mind is: If the kernel (core) of any operating system is susceptible to any bugs or errors, then the operating system controlling all the systems will be riddled with bugs and error-prone. The irony is that Yarvin, just like Thiel and Musk, are all so unintelligent that they are unable to recognize that their ruling systems are full of flaws, bugs and errors
The issue isn’t just that Yarvin, Thiel, and Musk fail to recognise the flaws in their own proposed systems — it’s that their frameworks are built on the assumption that they themselves are immune to error. The “kernel,” in their worldview, is not a neutral abstraction but a stand-in for their own intellect and authority. This isn’t oversight — it’s narcissism coded as governance. Any system that centralises control around the myth of infallible genius will inherit not just technical vulnerabilities, but human ones: bias, hubris, and the inevitable collapse that follows.
Religious systems suffer from the same design flaw. When the kernel is declared divine, critique becomes blasphemy, and error is sanctified. The result? Atrocities committed not despite belief, but because of it. There is nothing more dangerous than a dictator — except one who believes he kills in the name of God. #Project2025
Yes, agreed and well articulated.
As we know, any "kernel" within a physical construct is full of imperfections and thus requires "Checks & Balances" via a triangulation model at every step in any given governance framework.
I believe the Yarvin et al psychopathic algorithm wants to fully implement a so-called "God AI" that they solely control, to bypass any "Checks & Balances", and have their Clowns (Trump et al) sell it to the citizens as "Progress & Reform", and the ultimate solution to ALL problems.
This is why "AI & Big Data" are the current real "King & Queen" and central focus (kernel), for the New Dictators